Reuters has turned a report of a tragedy into an anti-Bushie/anti-war propaganda piece, with the help of some of the left’s best PR.
A stampede on a bridge over the Tigris River near Baghdad Wednesday claimed the lives of up to 1,000 people. Officials say it began when someone in the crowd shouted that there was an insurgent suicide bomber on the bridge, causing people to push, shove, and leap.
Reuters reports this and goes on to almost explicitly blame the Bush Administration and attack the effort in Iraq, with a little extraneous reporting/press release repeating:
Despite the draft constitution, there has been no easing in an insurgency waged by Sunni Muslims, dominant under Saddam, and international guerrillas inspired by Osama bin Laden.
The U.S.-led coalition invaded Iraq in March 2003 and has been battling insurgents while Iraqis have tried to form a new post-Saddam constitution and government.
The persistent fighting has helped to push down President George W. Bush’s approval rating to a career low of 45 percent on concerns over the war and soaring fuel prices, according to an ABC News/Washington Post poll published on Tuesday.
The U.S. war in Iraq now costs more per month than the average monthly cost of military operations in Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s, according to a report issued on Wednesday.
The report, entitled “The Iraq Quagmire” from the Institute for Policy Studies and Foreign Policy in Focus, both liberal, anti-war organizations, put the cost of operations in Iraq at $5.6 billion per month.
This breaks down to almost $186 million a day.
“By comparison, the average cost of U.S. operations in Vietnam over the eight-year war was $5.1 billion per month, adjusting for inflation,” it said.
Note that there is no mention of the Iraqis fighting their own insurgency. Note the Vietnam comparison. And there is no mention of how such negative reporting tacked extraneously onto the end of a story about a stamped on a bridge can distort views of the war and of the President.
“The Iraq Quagmire: The Mounting Costs of War and the Case for Bringing Home the Troops” propaganda piece cited without question by Reuters was put out by the Institute for Policy Studies and Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF).
The piece lists as its “Key Findings”: “‘The Iraq Quagmire’ is the most comprehensive accounting of the mounting costs and consequences of the Iraq War on the United States, Iraq, and the world. Among its major findings are stark figures that quantify the continuing of costs since the Iraqi elections, a period that the Bush administration claimed would be characterized by a reduction in the human and economic costs.”
The Institute for Policy Studies describes itself:
The Institute for Policy Studies strengthens social movements with independent research, visionary thinking, and links to the grassroots, scholars and elected officials. Since 1963, we have empowered people to build healthy and democratic societies in communities, the U.S., and the world.
IPS public scholars pursue their work with a common set of 10 core values and principles: peace, justice, environmental sustainability, participatory democracy, human rights, freedom, dignity, diversity, community, and international law.
That covers most of the left’s socialistic code words.
Foreign Policy in Focus describes itself:
We believe U.S. security and world stability are best advanced through a commitment to peace, justice and environmental protection as well as economic, political, and social rights. We advocate that diplomatic solutions, global cooperation, and grassroots participation guide foreign policy.
[ . . .]
FPIF aims to amplify the voice of progressives and to build links with social movements in the U.S. and around the world. Through these connections, we advance and influence debate and discussion among academics, activists, policymakers, and decisionmakers.
Is there anything to add?
One of the authors of the report, the IPS’ Phyllis Bennis, lists as her current work:
The Middle East component of the Project challenges the drive towards U.S. empire in that region and beyond, focusing particularly on ending the U.S. war and occupation in Iraq, and supporting a just and comprehensive peace based on an end to Israeli occupation of Palestine. The United Nations component analyzes U.S. domination of the UN and attempts to strengthen the potential role of the UN as part of a new internationalism and the global resistance to empire. Since September 11, 2001, the New Internationalism Project has also been involved in assessing the root causes of, and critiquing Bush administration responses to, that tragedy.
The other, Erik Lever, seems slightly more benign:
Erik is a Research Fellow with the peace and security program and serves as the Policy Outreach director for the Foreign Policy In Focus project. His current work includes conducting education and outreach on issues surrounding Iraq and multilateral institutions. In the last year he has been interviewed on numerous radio stations, done appearances on TV shows including MSNBC and ABC, and quoted in publications ranging from The Nation and The Washington Post to Al-Ahram (Egypt).
This is fringe stuff.
It appears that someone at Reuters found an anti-Bushie press release and tacked it on to the end of a news story about a tragic stampede believed by the Iraqi government to have been provoked by terrorists, the ones who can perhaps take heart from such reporting.
It seems that 5.5 out of 10 Americans Surveyed do not approve of the President (as described by the press). Remove the propaganda and take another poll. But you can’t remove the distortion, as it’s out there – in both senses. The saving grace is the declining influence both of the MSM and of the American left.